Bage VPS HK Lite 与 HK Standard 欧洲路由(RETN)详细对比 (补充Akile retn对比)

@Sameal #16 发布于4/1/2025, 12:00:43 PM
测了一下，我的cnfaster也是满血retn

+1 cnfaster 优化了路由，说是retn 10G 也是纯血

测了一下，我的cnfaster也是满血retn

借楼出租Bage HK Standered 2.59

bd

好测评
鸡腿奖励

好帖，送个鸡腿，希望能再多加几家来对比，比如DMIT、RFC

Ak HKLite系列的vps？

bd

@tommy101992 #11

akile是不是不同产品线路线路都不一样，第3和4我的比楼主高

========================
This image built by AkileCloud.
Build time: 2023-11-05 13:01:01 EST.
Last login: Tue Apr  1 06:08:37 2025 from 198.176.54.175
root@hkb1-202404202201026c1da7:~# ping -c2 89.19.38.1
PING 89.19.38.1 (89.19.38.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 89.19.38.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=156 ms
64 bytes from 89.19.38.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=154 ms

--- 89.19.38.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 154.473/154.988/155.503/0.515 ms

root@hkb1-202404202201026c1da7:~# ping -c2 94.158.240.10
PING 94.158.240.10 (94.158.240.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 94.158.240.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=179 ms
64 bytes from 94.158.240.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=179 ms

--- 94.158.240.10 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 179.158/179.167/179.177/0.009 ms

root@hkb1-202404202201026c1da7:~# ping -c2 91.190.240.1
PING 91.190.240.1 (91.190.240.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 91.190.240.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=178 ms
64 bytes from 91.190.240.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=242 time=183 ms

--- 91.190.240.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1000ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 178.072/180.471/182.870/2.399 ms

root@hkb1-202404202201026c1da7:~# ping -c2 157.180.0.110
PING 157.180.0.110 (157.180.0.110) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 157.180.0.110: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=172 ms
64 bytes from 157.180.0.110: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=172 ms

--- 157.180.0.110 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 172.015/172.084/172.153/0.069 ms

去美国怎么样啊