更新,刚问的:
It depends a bit on your use case. You shouldn't exceed 70% under sustained load, and during peaks, it generally doesn't matter—even if it lasts for several hours. We'll definitely contact you if your CPU usage gets too high.
翻译
这取决于你的具体使用场景。在持续高负载的情况下,CPU 使用率不应该超过 70%;而对于短时间的峰值负载,通常没什么问题,即使持续几个小时也可以。
如果你的 CPU 使用率过高,我们肯定会主动联系你。
总结:
CPU为共享CPU,官方说可以长期平均约 50%,允许短时间100%满载,甚至连续数小时的峰值也没问题,但不允许长期24×7跑满。
证据如下:
“They are shared cores. On average, you should not exceed 50%. That would be fair use for us. Peaks are of course not a problem, even for several hours.”
翻译:
这些是共享核心。平均 CPU 使用率不应超过 50%,这就是我们认为的合理使用。短时间的峰值当然没问题,即使持续几个小时也可以。
原帖:LowEndTalk — BERO HOST 2025 Black Friday EPYC Turin
“Permanent 100% utilization is not desired. 50% is basically fine with temporary peaks.”
翻译:
不希望长期保持 100% CPU 占用。长期 50% 基本没问题,也允许临时出现更高的峰值。
原帖:LowEndTalk — BERO HOST 2024 Ryzen 9950X Birthday
“In principle, it can be used 100% at any time, but not permanently, as the cores are not dedicated. It should not be a problem if you use 50-60% permanently and have peaks up to 100%.”
翻译:
原则上随时可以跑到 100%,但不能长期保持,因为这些核心并非独享。长期使用 50–60% 一般没有问题,同时允许峰值达到 100%。
不错
比绿云靠谱
德国那边除了netcup,其他几家所谓的VDS/Root Server = VPS
在纠结要不要把netcup rs1000换成这个
你算是说错了,刚问的
It depends a bit on your use case. You shouldn't exceed 70% under sustained load, and during peaks, it generally doesn't matter—even if it lasts for several hours. We'll definitely contact you if your CPU usage gets too high.
@jiesongbai #4 我本来已经忍住了,然后现在也在想要不要把NC的VPS 1000换成这个我好像感觉除了这个硬盘小一点,其他的对比NC全是优势
佬,在研究下流量这块呗
已上车
@lenchanlhc #5 哈哈那可以更新一下了,一年比一年多
@bitgaol #7 25t